|
|
 |
Feb
8/03 More
in weblog archive |
 |
|
|
Ivan
Reitman gives Canadian filmmakers a kick in the ass
The
producer of Ghostbusters and a host of other comedy hits
in Hollywood spoke at the Canadian Film and Television
Association this week after a year of stagnant Canadian
film and TV production (domestic) saying that Canadian
producers were to blame for living in the grant culture
and trying to figure out how to make their productions
'Canadian' in identity instead of trying to figure out
what people wanted to see. "Creating films for the
real world is ignored, and the audience is forgotten [when
filmmakers strive for the Canadian identity]", he
said. More
of what he said here >>> |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Feb
6/03 More
in weblog archive |
 |
|
|
Got
Suriyothai DVD
 |
| At
least it has battle scenes |
The
Thai epic that I had been complaining about finally
arrived on Tuesday, three days before I was going to
complain to HKFlicks and get a replacement. I will never
order something that has to travel through Canada Post
again.
I
slotted the Suriyothai DVD into Kelvin's Malata
last night. Not a good transfer and not anamorphic,
but watchable. The movie itself felt like it was originally
a mini-series. The first twenty minutes is like sitting
through a history lesson for those already familiar
with it. Only in the last two thirds (this is a long
film) are the main characters really established.
This
was the first Thai film I've seen so I wasn't really
sure if the language itself is flat or the delivery
flat. By the end of the film I decided that the actress
playing the title character Princess Suriyothai was
atrocious but without knowing the language I couldn't
say for certain. In general, Suriyothai has
a lot of scale with glittering sets, thousands of extras
and some good battle scenes. However, the overall story,
which is told in a fairytale style, is fairly unsophisticated
when you can actually follow it. The long historical
prologue in which so-and-so King is poisoned and so-and-so
conspirator rises only to be deposed again goes by like
just so many chapters in a textbook.
Pulling
a muscle for Clipstream™
Live
Yesterday
was a hectic day of running around with the camera.
In the morning I conducted a neat test in which I plugged
the Canon into a really heavy Panasonic laptop, slotted
in a wireless network card courtesty of Fatport.com
and walked around Hastings St. streaming Clipstream
Live for a few minutes. Ah, the future. Then an hour
later I was in Surrey hurriedly trying to hack together
a Clipstream™
Live webcast for the Winter2010
bid. It was a presentation to various Chamber of Commerce
representatives trying to show them how the Olympic
bid could benefit their communities. The webcast was
late getting set up because of various difficulties.
The next time I will insist on much more time setting
up in advance. Sometime during that running around day,
however, I pulled a muscle, probably my latissimus
dorsi. It still is pretty sore.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Feb.
2/03 More
in weblog archive |
 |
|
|
The
coming war on Iraq
 |
| Showdown at the Persian Gulf |
Those that know me personally know that I am against the
war on Iraq and not just because of my feelings about
the George W. Bush administration. In a thread on Skate
Jesus today I encapsulated my feelings on this situation.
I'm reposting it here as I doubt I will be able to put
it more plainly:
From
this post:
I do think that Bush has a bee in his bonnet
that has put a sense of urgency into pushing this war
on Iraq. And I believe it is this 'evidence' that the
administration is having such a hard time revealing
to the world. I can only guess that the evidence is
that the Iraq government is in the process of gaining
a counter to any conventional threat in the region which
could be nuclear or biological.
The
reason why other world leaders (who may or may not have
been shown this evidence) are supporting or not supporting
the U.S and Britain is that many of them simply do not
have a geopolitical stake in the region or are willing
to believe that Iraq, like Syria, will eventually rejoin
the world community and have no problem with Iraq entering
at a position of strength. With their nuclear power
(or whatever it is) they will be on par with Israel,
a country that has developed nuclear weapons and uses
it as a counter against a repeat of any of the previous
Arab-Israeli wars. And of course an Iraq with the ability
to nuke Israel is something the U.S. cannot abide either.
Iraq could become like a Pakistan, which has not avowed
hostility toward the Jews; the difference being Pakistan
is a client state of the U.S. and Iraq is not. A longview
might predict that Saddam will eventually die and the
regime will change and Coca Cola and blue jeans will
win out. Or it may not happen. This uncertainty is something
Bush and Blair cannot live with just like Kennedy couldn't
foresee that Cuba would be no threat to the U.S. decades
going on.
I
don't actually hold with a legalistic argument against
the war in Iraq. Legalistic excuses can be trumped up,
so can evidence. The powerful will always find an excuse
to go to war. However, a blatant disregard for legalistic
frameworks would have political consequences for the
U.S. which is why the U.S. is still bothering with the
UN inspections process and continuing its dialogue in
the Security Council. The major argument I have against
the war is that it will undoubtedly upset the balance
of power in the Gulf and will harden already hostile
attitudes around the world and especially in the Muslim
states toward the west in general (not just the U.S.
and Britain). It will make the world a much more antagonistic
place with greater dangers for decades to come. Do we
really want a new Cold War but predicated on culture
and religion? I do not.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
More
in weblog archive
|
|
|