Voting machines
 |
| It can only be attributable to human error. |
The United States is going through a big debate now
about the security of voting machines. After the 2000
election hung on a few hundred 'hanging chads' there
has been a big push to install computerized voting machines,
touch screen or otherwise that will take people's choices
and tabulate them. However, many critics charge that
the companies developing these machines are unwilling
to 'open' them up to scrutiny citing patents and the
ownership of the biggest companies are
biased
toward the Republicans. In not a few local and state
elections various
discrepancies
and mysterious results have cropped up that have made
many suspicious of tampering. The central issue
behind these machines is that there is no paper trail.
All the counts are in the computer. If the computer
is doubted, there is no secondary ledger to check the
votes against. You just have to trust that the program
is working correctly and that no one, either an insider
or
a hacker, has manipulated the count. The New York
Times has an article about the backlash against voting
machines
here.
PBS argues that perhaps
the
best technology may be no technology at all (i.e. the
Canadian system). If you are looking for critical
information on voting machines,
visit
BlackboxVoting.org. By the way, I have worked as
an election worker.