News Archive

News, webjunk, work archive

News, webjunk, work archive for July 22- July28/02

 
July 28/02

Concert filming and Paintballing
It's been an exhausting two days of filming and my arm is tired. Last night I videographed the last Fidgital concert at the Side Door in Kitsahlano and this morning I woke up early to help Dylan Couran, another Canon XL1 owner, make a paintball training video with a top rank amateur team. More on this tomorrow. For now: relaxation.
July 27/02

Successful time lapse experiment
Having learned my lesson regarding exposure from the last time lapse experiment, I achieved a success with a 16 hour session. See it here >>
July 25/02


My first visual narrative told through my camera
Here's an example of one of my earlier attempts to develop a visual narrative with my Canon DV, starring Kelvin. It's impressively named "A Man and his tiger". Dare you see the screen progression?

The first in a series of brilliant works >>


DR. BLOW

Austin Powers in Goldmember
Official Site | IMDB
dir. Jay Roach starring: Mike Meyers, Beyonce Knowles, Michael Caine
A sad excuse for potty humour, extended gags and 70s references is the latest, and hopefully last Austin Powers movie.


Ya babeee! I'm one tired franchise!

 

Growing more tiresome by each iteration, "Goldmember" can be summed up by one line: "Top Secret was better". Need to know more? Okay.

It's really, really sad when the only thing distinguishing this from that Abrahams and Zucker Bros. spy parody film is a lack of story. Yeah, Austin Powers has even less of a story that "Top Secret". Sure, Goldmember has better cameos (half of which come in the first two minutes), 200X the budget and an army of makeup technicians transforming Mike Myers into four different characters. Measured laugh for laugh, gag for gag, however, "Top Secret" comes on top.

Goldmember has nicer girls. Beyonce Knowles gets to thrust her midriff at the camera nicely and there are cuties throwing themselves at Austin everywhere after which we can hear that stupid line: "oh behave". The part with the Japanese twins with the amusing names was indistinguishable from the "Roger, roger" skit in "Airplane" except for the tits.

Mike Myers may be responsible for resurrecting 60s and 70s nostalgia on film for the masses, but Goldmember might be responsible for killing it too. I love Afros and a pimp suits and glitter. But after this assault on the mind I want to officially call retro-time travel dead. Making fun of the dresses and the music isn't entertaining any more.

All would be forgiven if Goldmember was actually funny enough. It isn't. The value of a film like "Top Secret" is that it throws so many gags at you at such a high rate that you can forgive the bad jokes because you don't even have time to consider them. In Goldmember the bad jokes are extended. And some of them are even repeated so if you hated them the first time, you can shut your eyes and nod away the next time they roll around.

What is truly infuriating about Goldmember is the extent to which it relies on fondness of the first two movies. So many of the gags reference the earlier movies that anyone who can't remember them will be shrugging or laughing because .. well.. everyone else seems to be having a good time. Yuck. Solid yuck.

What we have between all the spy movie references, bad SNL-level gags and Mike Myers ham is a lot of groaning potty humour. We have farting, crapping, peeing, wanking, crotch grabbing, kneeing, phallic references, booby references, and the old tired characters from the first two movies. The addition of Michael Caine makes for a couple good scenes as part of the 60s icon-stealing theme. Maybe in Austin Powers 4 he'll be relegated to the same position as Michael York. Better yet, he should hope to be killed off screen.

In theatres

July 24/02


DVDA Forum takes off!
Within a day of announcing DVDA on Grammarporn, WEF and assorted places DVDA is suddenly full of DV enthusiasts, students and pros. Page views jumped from 800 to nearly 3000 in the day since it was announced, posts increased from 96-187, and membership increased from 5-56 (28 today alone). I say after a couple weeks it won't be the hosts dominating the discussion. At least, that's my aim.


Hmmm.. this JavaScript include from Dephi kind of sucks but oh well.
July 23/02


DVDA Forum
This is beginning to trickle out so I will announce it to people who know me here. Matt Fraction (from MK12), Janet Harvey (Jungle Girl) and myself have started a Delphi forum for DV productions concentrating on technical discussion and creative inspiration called DVDA (snicker).

Why another DV moviemaking forum?
Actually, there are many good ones on the web but none exist on Delphi. As WEFugees (people fleeing the end of the Warren Ellis Forum) we naturally gravitate toward the great Delphi forum software that makes the posting of images, links and word formatting quite easy. Also, it allows for easy moderation of threads, something that other DV and indie filmmaking forums don't have, which tends to create an environment for flame wars and general jerkness.

Threads have been sprouting up in the past three days so I feel confident in having the handful of people who know me scope it out. Go to the forum here: http://forums.delphiforums.com/DVDA. Delphi membership is required but Basic membership (no images, no special formatting of messages) is free.

July 22/02


Downtown nighttime shooting
I went out last night with Kelvin and my friend Jeff to do some nighttime shooting in and around Yaletown (the trendy Vancouver apartment section where I live). We went up to the roof of Relic Entertainment (the makers of Homeworld) to shoot the apartment towers and also the moon which was partially full. At first all the shots were very muted and dark. Frustrated, I left to shoot some indoor footage when I discovered the ND filter button was on . ND = Neutral Density. It is used in daylight conditions to cut down on the amount of light coming through the lens. With that turned off, I could actually see the buildings around the offices.

The next problem was that everything was very saturated with red. We tried changing colour gain, opening the iris, and the only thing that seemed to make any slight improvement was the white balance plus or minus. This shows my lack of basic photography knowledge. In fact, I had never set my white balance to begin with. Setting the white balance gives the camera a basis for all colour representation. I had never done this for any shot much less calibrating for night shooting. Once this was determined, we found a white wall, hit the white balance button and the colours were instantly more balanced.

See screen caps of this experimental night here

 
  back to the top

 

 


copyright© 2002 Keith Loh

 


Click here to get back to the Keith Loh main page